The suit is led by Edwin Garrison and was filed against “FTX influencers,” primarily on YouTube.
A class-action suit led by Edwin Garrison has been filed against “FTX influencers,” mostly on YouTube, seeking $1 billion because they “promoted FTX crypto fraud without disclosing compensation.” The suit was filed on March 15 in the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division.
Kevin Paffrath, Graham Stephan, Andrei Jikh, Jaspreet Singh, Brian Jung, Jeremy Lefebvre, Tom Nash, Ben Armstrong, Erika Kullberg and Creators Agency LLC are named as respondents. The defendants are eight YouTubers, the talent management company that handled the promotion of FTX and the agency’s founder. According to the suit:
“Though FTX paid Defendants handsomely to push its brand and encourage their followers to invest, Defendants did not disclose the nature and scope of their sponsorships and/or endorsement deals, payments and compensation, nor conduct adequate (if any) due diligence.”
The suit describes the defendants as “influencers” who “present themselves as real-life consumers who share authentic and valuable information with their followers.”
Countersuit coming. The lawyers on this case can’t possibly be more stupid. I’ve never had contact with anyone at FTX and never even had a reflink.
Show me you are dumb without telling me you are dumb.
I’m going to roast these Low IQ plebs and their lawyers https://t.co/1y2ct85vFq
— Ben Armstrong (@Bitboy_Crypto) March 16, 2023
The Moskowitz Law Firm is representing the plaintiffs. The seven plaintiffs named are from various countries and all “purchased an unregistered security from FTX in the form of a YBA [yield-bearing account].” The suit claims the plaintiffs suffered damages through purchasing the “unregistered security” and the defendants promoted it for the financial benefit of themselves and/or FTX. Global and national classes of plaintiffs were identified in the suit and represent “thousands, if not millions, of consumers globally, to whom FTX offered and/or sold YBAs,” it claims.
The defendants are demanding damages in “a sum exceeding $1,000,000,000.00.”
Related: Binance.US, Alameda, Voyager Digital and the SEC — the ongoing court saga
The suit holds that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission warned in 2017 that if yield-bearing accounts are found to be securities, persons promoting them could be prosecuted for promoting an unregistered security or failing to properly disclose their payments and compensation. The question of whether that is the case has been “practically answered in the affirmative through various regulatory statements, guidance, and actions issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory entities,” the suit says.
In addition, the suit claims the SEC has shown a “consistent approach to cryptocurrency” and goes on to discuss recent and ongoing cases involving SEC and the crypto industry, as well as the Howey and Reves tests.
The suit is a consolidation of several class-action suits, according to the law firm. Garrison’s suit was filed on Nov. 15, 2022 “and is the first-filed FTX-related class action filed in the country,” the firm said. Garrison is also a plaintiff in the class-action suit filed against alleged celebrity endorsers of FTX as well.
